Jun 27, is now all set to effect sweeping changes in the execution of lyngdoh Committee Recommendation meant for the students’ union elections. Sep 6, Lyngdoh Committee Recommendations are perhaps the most cited phrases in DUSU politics today. To understand its importance and. The situation calls for an urgent discussion on the merits of the Lyngdoh. Committee recommendations. Report in Perspective. The issue of student politics has.
|Published (Last):||10 October 2004|
|PDF File Size:||7.63 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.59 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Up until that day, parties can freely distribute pamphlets urging students to join their organisation. What is JNU against? PTI Before this JNU was following its own mechanism with totally no intervention from the administration in choosing the students’ union leader.
Unfortunately, the guidelines have received brickbats from students and politicians alike, as many clauses are unrealistic and utopian. A disappointing trend in India. A candidate must have 75 per cent attendance. recommendahions
This Is Why JNU Is Rejecting Lyngdoh Committee’s Guidelines On Student Elections Again!
November 2 – Xommittee 3. Expressing anguish over the happenings in college and university campuses these days in the wake of Professor H. Candidates will not have criminal records i. To cleverly counter this, parties have been releasing posters that misspell the name of its candidate but allow it to be committse back to the party as well.
You can manage them any time from your browser settings. The students also submitted a memorandum to the officials in this regard. Prachi Mehra Mar 11, Reuters Some of the major recommendations of the committee were: Niharika Recommendagions Sep 12, You gave the news for what was posted by pinjratod. The committee, which lyngdlh up with a set of guidelines in its reportsubmitted its report in May They were also opposed to the presumed succumbing of various students outfits after the five-point relaxation in Lyngdoh committee report.
Lyngdoh had, in his reportsuggested sweeping reforms to keep off the influence of political parties, money and muscle power from campus during student union elections — and the apex court adopted all the Lyngdoh proposals in toto triggering wild reactions from rogue student leaders. Previous Post Book Launch: To escape these restrictive guidelines, parties have identified loopholes, a few such examples being: The Wednesday’s resolution to reject the Lyngdoh report will take essentially take the JNU back to its position committes when it had shunned the election exercise altogether in the campus as a mark of protest.
What happened after that? This rule may be relaxed in professional colleges where courses range between four and five years.
Hindustan Times Vijeata Balani vijeatab dubeat. Probably the most flouted clause in the recommendations, parties spend as much as lakhs to print countless pamphlets and hoardings that can be seen across the campus. DU Beat Sep 26, PTI This is likely to bring back the memories of a four year impasse between the students and administration from during which no student leader was elected in the varsity in protest against the Lyngdoh committee recommendations.
October 25 – October DU Beat Oct 13, Other reservations include the reduction of gecommendations campaign time from a month to a week and curb on expenditure allowed for the poll campaign. This will not post anything on Facebook or anywhere else. TAG dusu elections Pyngdoh Committee. The candidates will cooperate with the election officers and not distribute eatables or propaganda material. The aim was to reform the election system to make it more inclusive for students and involve fewer malpractices.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. November 3 – November lyngodh. The maximum age limit for postgraduate and research students to contest the elections would be years and 28 years.
The maximum permitted expenditure per candidate shall be INR The Lyngdoh Committee was set up by the Ministry of Human Resource Development MHRD in as per the direction of the Supreme Court to reform students’ union elections and to get rid of money and muscle power in student politics.
October 27 – October The committee suggested three modes for such indirect elections. Based on an order from the Supreme Court in Decembera six-member committee headed by former Chief Election Commissioner J M Lyngdoh in order to examine various issues like eligibility criteria, criminalization, financial transparency and expenditures in students’ union elections across the country.
Then you must have had a look on its T he Supreme Court ordered the implementation of J. The students are also against a cap on the number of times that a candidate can recontest.
Lyngdoh Committee: The Recommendations Which Have Remained Mere Recommendations – DU Beat
It recommednations larger universities with widespread campuses could allow individual colleges to constitute their own representative bodies, which would further elect representatives to the apex university body.
Meher Gill Sep 27, No candidate shall be permitted to make use of reconmendations posters, printed pamphlets, or any other printed material for the purpose of canvassing. Wednesday’s resolution of rejection brings them under a common fold now.
We’d like to show you notifications for the latest news and updates.
This Is Why JNU Is Rejecting Lyngdoh Committee’s Guidelines On Student Elections… Again!
They would also not have been subject to any disciplinary action by university authorities. They should be conducted between six to eight weeks from the start of the academic session.
The candidate shall not have a previous criminal record. This is likely to bring back the memories of a four year impasse between the students and administration from during which no student leader was elected in the varsity in protest against the Lyngdoh committee recommendations. Vijeata Balani Feb 25, Candidates must be regular, full time students and NOT distance education students.