[This is probably the most widely used algorithm for performing independent component analysis, a recently developed variant of factor analysis that is. Independent Component Analysis [Aapo Hyvärinen, Juha Karhunen, Erkki Oja] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. A comprehensive. Aapo Hyvärinen and Erkki Oja. Helsinki University of with the title “Independent Component Analysis: Algorithms and Applications”. April 1 Motivation.
|Published (Last):||15 June 2006|
|PDF File Size:||7.11 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.54 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This is in stark contrast independemt uncorrelatedness, which means that 6. Machine Learning, Tokyo, Japan vol. Shows that this takes temporal correlations into account, and combines them with non-Gaussianity. Random variables and their realizations are not typographically different, but the index t always denotes realizations.
See also Hyvarinen et al. Comppnent fact, this is an estimate of the negative differential entropy of the components, and differential entropy can be shown to be maximized for a Gaussian variable for fixed variance.
Dodge Y, Rousson V. The differences between the conditions k are thus modelled by the diagonal matrices D k. If we assume the data are Gaussian, the two models give equally good fits.
Independent component analysis: recent advances
hyvarrinen The idea is to consider a generative model similar to the one in 6. Considering the vector of short-time Fourier transforms of the observed data vector, we simply take the sum of the log-moduli over each window and component, obtaining.
Comparing this with 2. Neural Computing Surveys 2: Here, we can reduce the dimension of the data to nthe dimension of the original data matrices, and then analyssis ICA to obtain the common independent component matrix S.
Nature— Interestingly, both of these approaches lead to essentially the same objective function. Source adaptive blind source separation: Topographic Independent Component Analysis.
Computationally efficient group ICA for large groups. Zibulevsky M, Pearlmutter BA.
Independent component analysis: recent advances
The datasets can be from different subjects in brain imaging, or just different parts of the same larger data set. Open Hyavrinen article [Extends the theory of the preceding paper to testing the values of the independent components themselves.
The pdf is typically of the form. Denote by X k the data matrix obtained from the k th condition or subject.
Blind separation of sources, part I: This is in stark contrast to basic ICA using non-Gaussianity, which can estimate the model even if all the components have identical statistical properties essentially, this means equal marginal pdfs.
Training products of experts by minimizing contrastive divergence. Zoran D, Weiss Y. A model in which the components are linearly correlated without considering any time structure was analysiss by Sasaki et al.
Publications by Aapo Hyvarinen: FastICA
This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Applications in Signal and Image Processing. Identifiability, separability, uniqueness of linear ICA models. Features an easy-to-use software package for Matlab.
Aapo Hyvärinen: Publications
Estimating an Ordering of Correlated Components. The dependencies of the estimated “independent” components are visualized as a topographic order. Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer. In the case of actual time series x i t and s i tdependencies between the components which would usually be called source signals can obviously have a temporal aspect as well. Perhaps analyiss more promising recent approach is to use time—frequency decompositions, such as wavelets or short-time Fourier transforms.
The simplest way of modelling this process is analyxis assume that the components are generated in two steps.
For whitened data, considering an orthogonal mixing matrix, we estimate by maximizing some objective function that is related to a measure of non-Gaussianity of the components. Application of ordinary ICA on will estimate all the quantities involved.
However, this is meaningless because a linear transform of a linear transform is still a linear transform, and thus no new information can be obtained after the first ICA, any subsequent ICA would just return exactly the same components.
In most of the widely used ICA algorithms, the non-quadratic functions G i are fixed; possibly just their signs are adapted, as is implicitly done in FastICA [ 77 ].
Under suitable assumptions, joint approximate diagonalization of such covariance matrices estimates the ICA model, and a number of algorithms have been developed for such joint diagonalization [ 343536 ]. Blind separation of mixture of independent sources through a quasi-maximum likelihood approach.
For non-Gaussian variables, on the other hand, whitening does not at all imply independence, and there is much more information in the data than what is used in whitening. Pairwise likelihood ratios for estimation of non-Gaussian structural equation models. Independent component analysis of fMRI group studies by self-organizing clustering.
Component separation with flexible models: