Beginning with the premise that the attack must be taken seriously, Eric Havelock shows that Plato’s hostility is explained by the continued domination of the. PREFACE TO PLATO science and to morality: the major Greek poets from. Homer to Euripides must be excluded from the educational system of Greece. Preface to Plato has ratings and 7 reviews. Tim said: For those billions of you loosing sleep each night trying to figure out why Plato was so hostil.

Author: Mishakar Galrajas
Country: Canada
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Health and Food
Published (Last): 22 September 2016
Pages: 136
PDF File Size: 19.55 Mb
ePub File Size: 18.92 Mb
ISBN: 792-9-91424-593-1
Downloads: 79653
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Samushura

Theall has called the “Toronto School of Communications. There have been affirmations and criticism of Havelock’s methods. But his philological concerns now were only a small part of a much larger project to make sense of the nature of the Greek culture itself.

Among classicists the response ranged from indifference to derision, with the majority simply questioning the details of Havelock’s history of literacy, pointing both to earlier instances of writing than Havelock thinks possible or to later instances of oral influence.

Preface to Plato — Eric A. Havelock | Harvard University Press

Cornford at Cambridge, Havelock began to question the received pllato about the nature of pre-Socratic philosophy and, in particular, about its relationship with Socratic thought. Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy. In The Literate Revolution in Greecehis penultimate book, Havelock recalls being struck by a discrepancy between the language used by the philosophers he was studying and the heavily Platonic idiom with which it was interpreted in the standard texts.


Views Read Edit View history. Lists with This Book. They cling to a preconception of his intentions, insensibly allowing their minds to mould the content of what they read into the required shape.

Further I do not understand Greek. Once again, his description of this historical process is in itself, thought-provoking. The basic question is why Plato is so adamant about banning all poets from his Republic, in the dialogue by that name.

Matthew Lopez rated it it was amazing Apr 03, Alexa Actionable Analytics for the Web. Patrick lpato it really liked it Jul 24, Amazon Giveaway allows you to run promotional giveaways in order to create buzz, reward your audience, and attract new followers and customers.

Amazon Second Chance Pass it on, trade it in, give it a second life.

Find it on Scholar. Sold by ayvax and ships from Amazon Fulfillment. Join Our Mailing List: This book is not yet featured on Listopia. The first questions he raised about the relationship between literacy and orality in Greece concerned the nature of the historical Socrateswhich was a long-debated issue. For Greeks, poetry meant Homer, and so Havelock argues we need to understand the role of Homer in traditional Greek society. Hoerber complains in a review of the book of Havelock’s “rapid dismissal” of the evidence of earlier writing, and feels that “the present work will meet with even less acceptance than the author’s previous volume” Classical Philology Plato, through Socrates, indulges in a huge polemic.

Hacelock and discover other items: But if the label has a popular and recognisable ring, it can come to exercise a kind of thought control over those who take the book in their hands. Plato attacks poets, particularly Homer, as the sole source of Greek moral and technical instruction–Mr.


H. Osborne, “Preface to Plato”: Eric A. Havelock – PhilPapers

Oct 13, Hugolane rated it really liked it. Havelock’s influence has spread beyond the study of the classical world to that of analogous transitions in other times and places. While at Toronto, Plaot began formulating his theory of orality and literacy, establishing the context of a later movement at the University interested in the critical study of communication, which Donald F. In the latter part of his career, Havelock’s relentless pursuit of his unvarying thesis led to a lack of interest in addressing opposing viewpoints.

Follow the Author

See all 8 reviews. Hershbell – – Journal of prefacs History of Philosophy 34 3: The Collected Papers of Milman Parry. Ong who was himself strongly influenced by Havelock essentially founded the amorphous field that studies transitions from orality to literacy, and Havelpck has been one of the most frequently cited theorists in that field; as an account of communication, his work profoundly affected the media theories of Harold Innis and Marshall McLuhan.

Thanks for telling us about the problem.

James Lorimer, Eric James rated it really liked it Jun 24, A classic on Literacy and Orality. Gregg Miller rated it it was amazing Mar 04, lpato While studying under F.

Explore the Home Gift Guide.