This tutorial provides hands-on step-by-step instructions on how to create a DoDAF-compliant architecture model of the operational view for a simplified land . “DoDAF Version serves as the overarching, comprehensive framework and conceptual model enabling the development of architectures to facilitate the. The tutorial will provide an introduction to the DoD Architecture Framework ( DoDAF). The tutorial will begin with a brief introduction to Enterprise Architecture .
|Published (Last):||8 November 2014|
|PDF File Size:||2.71 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.26 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In this manner, the DM2 supports the exchange and reuse of architectural information among JCAs, Components, and Federal and Coalition partners, thus facilitating the understanding and implementation of interoperability of processes and systems.
This document addressed usage, integrated architectures, DoD and Federal policies, value of architectures, architecture measures, DoD decision support processes, development techniques, analytical techniques, and the CADM v1. Otherwise there is the risk of producing products with no customers. Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture has been debated:. The developing system must not only meet its internal data needs but also those of the operational framework into which it is set.
Freeing your team from the high cost and error-prone approach of manually updating artifacts, CORE provides on-demand generation of views and work products enabling you to focus your efforts where they are needed most — on developing quality architectures to meet the needs of your customer or enterprise.
One concern about the DoDAF is how well these products meet actual stakeholder concerns for any given system of interest. The repository is defined by the common database schema Core Architecture Data Model 2. The concept of capability, as defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:.
Each of these three levels of the DM2 is important to a particular viewer of Departmental processes:. Definitions and Guidelines”, “II: The Department of Defense Architecture Framework DoDAF is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense DoD that provides visualization infrastructure for specific stakeholders concerns through viewpoints organized by various views.
Node is a complex, logical concept that is represented with more concrete concepts. The three views and their interrelationships — driven by common architecture data elements — provide the basis for deriving measures such as interoperability or performance, and for measuring the impact of the values of these metrics on operational mission and task effectiveness.
In addition to graphical representation, there is typically a requirement to provide metadata to the Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository DITPR or other architectural repositories. All view AV products provide overarching descriptions of the entire architecture and define the scope and context of the architecture.
The OV provides textual and graphical representations of operational nodes and elements, assigned tasks and activities, and information flows between nodes. As one example, the DoDAF v1.
These products are organized under four views:. Move beyond disjoint architecture views and develop integrated architectures.
Celebrating 25 Years of Excellence in Systems Engineering
Product Descriptions” and a “Deskbook”. The DoDAF provides a foundational framework for developing and representing architecture descriptions that ensure a common denominator for understanding, comparing, and integrating architectures across organizational, joint, and multinational boundaries. Leverage the power of architectures across your organization with intelligent architectures.
Systems and services view SV is a set of graphical and textual products that describe systems and services and interconnections providing for, or supporting, DoD functions. There are many different approaches for creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF and for determining which products are required. Each view depicts certain perspectives of an architecture as described below. Leverage integrated support to explore engineering, architecture, and business alternatives tuotrial deliver on your best enterprise solution with CORE.
In simpler terms, integration is seen in the connection from items common among architecture products, where items shown in one architecture product such as sites used or systems interfaced or services provided should yutorial the identical number, name, and meaning appear in related architecture product views. It establishes data element definitions, rules, and relationships and a baseline set of products for consistent development of systems, integrated, or federated architectures.
Department of Defense Architecture Framework – Wikipedia
Views Read Edit View history. The actual sequence of view generation and their potential customization is a function of the application domain and the specific needs of the effort.
Only a subset of the full DoDAF viewset is usually created for each system development. Technical standards view TV products define technical standards, implementation conventions, business rules and criteria that govern the architecture.
As the DM2 matures to meet the ongoing data requirements of process owners, decision makers, architects, and new technologies, it will evolve to a resource that more completely supports the requirements for architectural data, published in a consistently understandable way, and will enable greater ease for discovering, sharing, and reusing architectural data across organizational boundaries. The sequence of the artifacts listed below gives a suggested order in which the artifacts could be developed.
It addressed the Deputy Secretary of Defense directive that a DoD-wide effort be undertaken to define and develop a better means and process for ensuring that C4ISR capabilities were interoperable and met the needs of the warfighter.
Integrated architectures are a property or design principle for architectures tutorixl all levels: It defines the type of dodad exchanged, the frequency of exchanges, the tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and the nature of the exchanges.
It establishes a basis for semantic i. It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets and practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community.
These views relate to stakeholder requirements for producing an Architectural Description. The Capability Models describe capability taxonomy and capability evolution. The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format.