Baixe grátis o arquivo DN no controle da dor musculoesquelética – of pain.2–4 MTrPs were the primary source of pain in 74% of 96 patients with. Classificao das Fontes de Poluio Cdigo DN 74/ Descrio da. da Deliberação Normativa (DN) COPAM nº 74/ para a atividade do empreendimento.

Author: Tojalkree Mezinos
Country: Portugal
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Science
Published (Last): 25 June 2011
Pages: 358
PDF File Size: 11.63 Mb
ePub File Size: 4.60 Mb
ISBN: 700-9-25755-395-6
Downloads: 18802
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Dout

Marking out the quadratus lumborum muscle before needling.

Enquadramento Revisão DN COPAM 74 – Licenciamento Ambiental

This article was externally peer reviewed. Any effect of these therapies is probably because of the needle or placebo rather than the injection of either saline or active drug.

Dry-needling, Myofascial Trigger Points, Pain, Connective Tissue, Musculoskeletal, Alternative Medicine Myofascial pain is a common form of pain that arises from muscles or related fascia and is usually associated with myofascial trigger points MTrP. However, the treatment effects were small.

There also is a great need for further investigation into the development of pain at myofascial trigger points. Dry needling is a treatment modality that is minimally invasive, cheap, easy to learn with appropriate training, and carries a low risk.

However, over areas with potential risk of significant adverse events, such as lungs and large blood vessels, we suggest using the superficial technique, which has also been shown to be effective, albeit to a lesser extent. There was evidence that acupuncture in conjunction with other conventional therapies relieves pain and improves function better than the conventional therapies alone.

Myofascial pain is a common syndrome seen by family practitioners worldwide. Nevertheless, the patient commonly experiences an immediate decrease in sensitivity after the needling procedure. The radiculopathy model is copaam on empirical observations by the Canadian physician Dr. The deep method of dry needling has been shown to be more effective than the superficial one for the treatment of pain associated with myofascial trigger points.


J Am Cn Fam Med ; These effects were only observed immediately after the end of the sessions and at short-term follow-up.

Enquadramento Revisão DN COPAM 74 – Licenciamento Ambiental

InKarel Lewit11 proposed that cn effect of injections were primarily cause by the mechanical stimulation of an MTrP with the needle. Dry needling is easy to learn, and a basic course usually lasts 2 to 4 days. Numerousnoninvasivemethods—suchas stretching, massage, ischemic compression, laser therapy, heat, acupressure,ultrasound,transcutaneouselectrical nerve stimulation, biofeedback, and pharmacological treatments—have been used to alleviate chronic myofascial pain, but no single strategy has.

Furlan and colleagues23 also mentioned the low methodologic quality of original studies. In addition, in numerous randomized clinical trials RCTs and one systematic review, no difference was found between injections of different substances and dry needling in the treatment of MTrP symptoms.

DN no controle da dor musculoesquelética – Artigo

Dry needling seemed to be a useful adjunct to other therapies for chronic low back pain. Different methods of dry needling, its effectiveness, and physiologic and adverse effects are discussed. The sites for needle insertion are located in skeletal muscles taught in any basic anatomy course. Secondly, sample sizes were generally small, which raises the possibility of type I error, where the likelihood of a study producing a false-negative result is increased. It was concluded that there is evidence of pain relief and functional improvement of chronic coam back pain with the use of acupuncture compared with no treatment or sham therapy.


Gunn named it intramuscular stimulation IMS. Although an acupuncture needle is used, the therapy is based on the traditional reasoning of Western medicine. BoxBeer ShevaIsrael E-mail: The aim of this review is to introduce dry needling, a relatively new treatment modality used by physicians and physical therapists worldwide as a part of complex treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain, to the wide audience of family physicians, rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, physiatrists, pain specialists, dentists, and physical therapists.

Dry needling methods were empirically developed to treat musculoskeletal disorders. If there is any residual pain, the needle is reinserted for another 2 to 3 minutes. In the musculature, this manifests as muscle shortening, pain, and the development of taut bands 47 MTrPs.

Chan Gunn,15 who was one of the pioneers of dry needling. Until evidence of the possible mechanism of action of needling is available, or until different interventions have been compared directly, there is no logical basis for choosing the optimal intervention.

Baldry22 recommended inserting an acupuncture needle into the tissues overlying each MTrP to a depth of 5 to 10 m for 30 seconds. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of dry needling.

Because the needle does not necessarily reach the MTrP, local twitch responses are not expected. The authors found no statistical difference between the 2 methods. Several schools and conceptual models of dry needling have developed during the last 3 decades; most common are radiculopathy15 and MTrP1 models. Its effectiveness has been confirmed in numerous studies and 2 comprehensive systematic reviews.