Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology. Rudolph Carnap. [In this essay Carnap is concerned with the question of the “reality” of the sorts of what he calls “abstract. Rudolf Carnap’s article “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology” deals with the implications of accepting language which refers to abstract entities. Empiricists. Carnap, “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology”. Major Premise: Accepting the existence abstract entities involves a pragmatic decision to use a certain linguistic.

Author: Zuzuru Gushura
Country: South Africa
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Education
Published (Last): 11 May 2016
Pages: 294
PDF File Size: 19.67 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.39 Mb
ISBN: 234-5-82551-237-5
Downloads: 75933
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Migul

Semantics, Empiricism, and Ontology. Carnap and Ontological Pluralism.

This gives me the right to use the linguistic forms of the numerical framework and to make semantical statements about numbers as designata of numerals. References to space-time points, the electromagnetic field, or electrons in physics, to real or complex numbers and their functions in mathematics, to the excitatory potential or unconscious complexes in psychology, to an inflationary trend in economics, and the like, do not imply the assertion that entities of these kinds occur as immediate data.

This shows again the confusion mentioned, because a superstition or myth is a false or dubious internal statement. This article has no associated abstract.

Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology. —

The new entities are values of these variables; the constants and the closed compound expressions, if any are substitutable for the variables. It is the purpose of this article to clarify this controversial issue. If suitable rules for this term are laid down, the following is likewise analytic:.

New variables, “p,” “q,” etc. Carnap – – Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4: And indeed, if we were to ask them: Perhaps the discussions in the present paper will ontolog in clarifying the role of the system of linguistic rules for the introduction of a framework for entities on the one hand, and that of extra-systematic explanations concerning the nature of the entities on the other.


If someone decides to accept the thing language, there is no objection against saying that he has accepted the world of things.

Carnap provides the following example of this problem of proof: Each point is an ordered quadruple of four real numbers, called its coordinates, of three spatial and one temporal coordinate. Internal questions and possible answers to them are formulated with the help of the new forms of expressions. We could choose to not continue using the empiricsm thing language, instead using a fmpiricism of sense-data or “phenomenal” entities, or to construct another language structure entirely – or we could just refrain from speaking!

Let us be cautious in making assertions and critical in examining them, but tolerant in permitting linguistic forms.

Carnap, “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology”

A physicist who is suspicious of abstract entities may perhaps try to declare a certain part of the language of physics as uninterpreted and uninterpretable, that part which refers to real numbers as space-time coordinates or as values of physical magnitudes, to functions, limits, etc. This entry has no external links. Linguistic Convention and Worldly Fact: However, it would prevent the use of ordinary geometry which says, e.

Sign in to use this feature. Peirce and Frege, a great majority accepted abstract entities. With the help of the new variables, general sentences may be formed, e. It leads to the absurd consequence, that the position of everybody who accepts the language of physics with its real number variables as a language of communication, not merely as a calculus would be called Platonistic, even if he is a strict empiricist who rejects Platonic metaphysics.


Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology

Therefore every sentence of the form “. It can only be judged as being more or less expedient, fruitful, conducive to the aim for which the language is intended.

They do, of course, not mean the internal question; the affirmative answer to this question is empiriciwm and trivial and too obvious for doubt or denial, as we have seen.

The statement “There are propositions” may be meant in the sense of d ; in ontokogy case it is analytic since it follows from a and even trivial. This involves introducing new types of variables, expressions substitutable for them, and the general terms “integer” and “rational number. A Note on Ontology and Ordinary Language. The system of things only had extended objects with spatial and temporal relations between them. Carnap and Ontological Pluralism.

With respect to the basic attitude to take in choosing a language form an “ontology” in Quine’s terminology, which seems to me misleadingthere appears now to be agreement between us: Sign in Create an account. Epistemology in 20th Century Philosophy Carnap: The latter is the name given by Gilbert Ryle 8 to the criticized belief, which, in his view, arises by a naive inference of analogy: The psychological question as to which kinds of entities do and which do not occur as immediate data is entirely irrelevant for semantics, just as it is for physics, mathematics, economic;, etc.